How the Grinch Promoted Animal Cruelty

I read my son How the Grinch Stole Christmas!, because why the hell wouldn’t I?

One particular picture gave me pause:

He took the roast beast!

He took the roast beast!

What bugged me about this picture? No, it wasn’t the bizarre egg-stacking method that the Whos seem to engage in:

Grinch eggs

No normal person would stack eggs like this.

It was this:

Grinch fish

Is that the fish from The Cat in the Hat?

There is a live fish just sitting in some Who’s refrigerator. That means on the night before Christmas, somebody in Cindy Lou Who’s house decided to take a fish and leave it in the refrigerator to slowly suffocate to death next to the roast beast.

And don’t try to tell me the fish is already dead. It’s very clearly thrashing its tail and gulping for air, begging the Grinch for mercy. Unfortunately for it, the Grinch probably just stuffs it into its sack to die next to some stolen firewood.

Then I realized there are no pets in Whoville. In fact, every animal that gets shown in this book is being mistreated in some way. In addition to the fish, there’s poor old Max, who is stuck pulling a sled filled with an entire village worth of Christmas swag:

Poor Max

Poor Max 

There are mice who are left to starve to death after the Grinch deprives them of the crumbs they apparently live off of. And then there’s a single bird:

Grinch bird

The one animal the Whos haven’t yet captured and tormented.

That bird may seem to be peripheral to the story, but I’m beginning to think it’s no coincidence that the Grinch is about to dump the entirety of his sleigh on top of its head. The bird isn’t looking at the Grinch in curiosity as it tries to figure out what’s going on – it’s looking in abject terror at the impending yuletide doom.

But surely things change once the Grinch learns his lesson?

No.

Grinch ending

Apparently the Grinch’s heart would have needed to grow FOUR sizes in order to keep him from treating his pets like shit.

If you can’t tell due to the blurry picture I took, that’s the Grinch bringing the toys back to all the Who girls and boys. And where is Max? He’s pushing the damned sled. Even when his master has a triple-sized heart, he’s still got to do more manual labor than any one creature should ever do.

The animated adaptation of the story ends with Cindy Lou Who giving Max the first slice of roast beast. This is a complete add-on. The actual scene in the book has Max nowhere in sight. Considering that the Whos apparently don’t believe in pets and like to torment animals by slowly murdering them, we can only guess that Max was cooked alive to be eaten as a second course.

I always thought it was odd that Santa didn’t step in to help out the Whos after the Grinch stole from them. As it turns out, he’s staying the hell away from Who-ville, because everybody near that place is a bunch of animal-killing psychopaths.

Advertisements

One Response to “How the Grinch Promoted Animal Cruelty”

  1. Never really considered it, but you’re right. Many animals were harmed in the making of this book. Unless you considered that maybe the Who’s and the Grinch himself aren’t human, but a subset of primate. Then it’s not necessarily animal cruelty, but animal dominance? Good post!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: